I always face this problem when I sit down to write about a production from the TEAM (Theatre of the Emerging American Moment). I’ve seen three of their shows: Particularly in the Heartland (Traverse Theater), Architecting (P.S. 122), and now Mission Drift (The Connelly Theater), and it happens every time: exposed to their rip-roaring style of fully committed theater, I’m struck by an incredible loss for words in how to relate that work to those who have not yet seen the production.
After a few days of thinking about their latest production, Mission Drift, I’ve come to the conclusion that this is because the TEAM usually veers away from distinct narrative in favor of ideological, immersive mood. Like the TEAM’s other productions, Mission Drift is a series of parallel stories, grasping for ways to explain what it’s like to be living in a certain kind of America.
Posted in Theatre Reviews, Uncategorized
Tagged amber gray, architecting, ben gullard, brian hastert, collaborative theater, culture, danielle king, double m arts and events, evolution, fringe theater, gabe gordon, heather christian, ian lassiter, jake heinrich, jenny worton, jon degaetano, joseph cantalupo, las vegas, lauren adelman, libby king, lucy kendrick smith, matt bogdanow, matt hubbs, michael mushalla, mission drift, nate koch, nick vaughn, nyc, nyc culture, off broadway, particularly in the heartland, paz pardo, political theater, positive reviews, ps122, rachel chavkin, reviews, sean linehan, stowe nelson, the connelley theater, the team, theater, theater companies, theater of the emerging american moment, traverse theatre
In theater, each night of an individual production’s run is different. When two different companies – seperated by both miles and years – perform a play, the separate interpretations magnify both flaws and strengths in their texts – and the differences in their productions become tools for gaining new insight into the multi-faceted fragility of this collaborative art form.
Having first seen Dublin By Lamplight when The Corn Exchange brought it to the Traverse Theater during the 2005 Edinburgh Fringe Festival, my second viewing was at the hands of Inis Nua, a Philadelphia-based company taking part in 1st Irish 2011 – a festival of Irish Theatre that spans New York City.
Posted in Theatre Reviews, Uncategorized
Tagged 2005, 59E59, british theatre guide, criticism, culture, david chadderton, dublin by lamplight, edfringe, edinburgh fringe festival, eire abu, halfpenny bridge, inis nua theatre, irish national theatre of ireland, jared michael delaney, jered mclenigan, john lionarons, katie chick, language, maggie baker, mark jesse swanson, megan bellwoar, meghan jones, melanie leeds, michael doherty, michael west, mike dees, national theater, New York Theater, political theater, Politics, positive review, sarah van auken, terry smith, the corn exchange, the laundries, theater reviews, tom reing, traverse theatre, UES
What a fantastic little fable about American politics. In THE BODY POLITIC, writers Richard Abrons and Margarett Perry (the latter of whom also directs this production) have crafted a whip-cracker of a tale about a Republican who falls for a Democrat on the campaign trail. As their relationship – and the campaign – progresses, the young party-liners find themselves negotiating and renegotiating their plans to win the presidency for their candidates.
Abrons and Perry have crafted a world where the superficial trappings of the political machinery are present, creating a backdrop against which the action unfurls, but at the same time they’ve kept the spotlight on the characters in this play – their intrigues and double-crosses, their strategizing and bending of moral certitude – instead of getting bogged down in, you know, actual politics.
At its opening, the six characters of THE BODY POLITIC are waiting for their town cars after a debate. Alternately charming and scathing, the two youngest members of the campaign trade barbs – with young WASP Spencer Davis (Matthew Boston) getting in a few cheeky zings at his democratic counterpart, Trish Rubenstein (Eve Danzeisen). The scenes move quickly – at times the pace of the production feels more filmic than theatrical, with audiences often having only a few pages’ worth of rapid-fire dialogue to establish a setting and connect with the characters’ intentions. It’s a gambit that could make the piece feel choppy, but instead – to an audience member familiar with political drama like THE WEST WING and IN THE LOOP – it’s easy to quickly decide where each scene fits with the one before it. The result is that the pace of the piece is kept moving at a steady clip, and at no point in the production does one feel that horrible sense of time’s immovable plodding. The show might run two hours long (including an intermission), but is tightly constructed and never feels like a drag.
The chemistry between the two protagonists is sometimes lacking, but both Boston and Danzeisen are a pleasure to watch as they’re played off and against one another by their fellow campaigners, and it is the likeability of both these actors that keeps their characters sympathetic despite the tricks they play; we can admire their tenacity and commitment to their own ideals because on sensitive issues, the playwrights have found ways to legitimately express the frustrations, hopes, fears and motivations of both the religious right and the radical lefties – while at the same time reminding us that actually, both Democrats and (to a lesser degree now that the Tea Party has arrived) Republicans benefit from a polarized system.
The rest of the cast is entertaining and enjoyable – particularly Leslie Hendrix, whose turn as Political Warrior Goddess Brunhilda Logan transports this play into high satire; her blunt, direct and mannish delivery is an absolute delight. From brutal profanities to a direct delivery of threatened emasculation, Brunhilda is a fizzing, spitting Fury – and Hendrix is utterly delightful in the role.
If you’re looking for affordable (for NYC) theater at a terrific venue (59E59 is a personal favorite of mine), then you can’t go wrong with THE BODY POLITIC.
Posted in Activism & Politics, Lifestyle, Theatre Reviews
Tagged 59E59, Activism & Politics, atheism, brunhilda logan, criticism, democrats, eve danzeisen, leslie hendrix, margarett perry, matthew boston, new plays, new writing, New York Theater, nyc, nyc theater, Opinion, political campaign, political theater, Politics, positive review, primary colors, religion, religion in politics, republicans, review, richard abrons, romantic comedy, spencer davis, the body politic, theater, theater review, theater reviews, theatre, trish rubenstein, two-party system